84
based on /policy
of attracting students from
China. Any such objective would be outside
CAL
deliberate /
On Such CD IN
am.
the scope of C.D. & W. assistance
assistance could therefore be justified only
on ground that it could profitably be used
within (roughly) pre-war limits; since
both Hong Kong Government assistance and
H. M. G.'s grant are already available, any
request for C. D. & W. assistance over and
We've f
Min
above amounts thus available would require
ific
a great deal of justification,
-
4. Your paragraph 5. It remains a
reasonable supposition that opening of
Malayan University would reduce the number
auf
of students from Malaya and Hong Kong.
5. Your paragraph 6. I cannot accept
+ forming par
suggestion that H. M. G. 's free grant of
£250,000 is being used "as a pretext" for
refusing a grant from C. D. & W. funds. Nor
could I accept any implication (though I feel sure
this was not intended) that H. M. G. 's generosity
in granting £250,000 towards the University
imposes on H. M. G. an obligation to multiply
that amount by two. The position is as set
out in paragraphs 2 and 3 above.
6. Your paragraph 7. I heartily endorse
your view that it would be rash to utilise
the whole of H. M. G. 's grant on capital development
involving recurrent charges which it might
be difficult to meet.
7.
May I suggest that considered plans
for rehabilitation and development of University
to
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.